We're on the right track with public transport

Surely one of the most short-sighted decisions in the history of the State was the removal of trams from the city’s streets in the late 1940s, followed a decade later by the axing of the legendary Hill of Howth service.

Just imagine the positive impact on tourism today if the lines had remained in place in the intervening decades before trams seemed like a good idea again. 

While our state-of-the art light rail system has been a major hit with 21st century commuters, I’m told that the Luas doesn’t come close to matching the Dublin trams of old, where you could take a day trip out to Dalkey, Howth, Sutton, Clontarf or even Blessington.

It was a major upheaval for Dubliners all those decades ago when tram tracks had to be ripped up from the streets to make way for buses and cars in the name of ‘progress’.

Equally, reinstating the tracks for the Luas has been a headache for commuters, particularly given the modern-day explosion in traffic. Work to connect the two lines across the city is ongoing. A little bit like Dublin itself, it will be great when it’s finished.

In terms of public transport, we’re slowly getting there, even though we’re still waiting on a rail service of some description to key locations such as the airport and major population centres like Swords.

I had reason to take the bus to work on a number of days last week due to car trouble and was pleasantly surprised by how the service has improved. There’s an app that gives real-time information on when your bus will arrive – there’s even on board wi-fi. If only they served coffee!

The one negative aspect was having to listen to commuters babble incessantly into their phones as if they were the only ones on the bus. I was better prepared the next day, making sure I brought a set of earphones – problem solved.

Travelling to work by car is fast becoming the least attractive option, with fuel, parking and toll costs making it increasingly unviable.

With a bit of joined-up thinking (and joined-up Luas lines), there’s no reason not to consider using public transport more – even if it’s not a patch on the old tram system.

Mixed feelings about church camera ban

My youngest son will be making his First Holy Communion this weekend and we’re all really looking forward to the day.

Whether you’re a devout catholic or not, the occasions of Communion or Confirmation are important milestones in a child’s journey through life and provide cherished, lasting memories for all the family.

Quite rightly, we will now be prohibited from taking photographs during the ceremony – a sensible rule in itself.

The proliferation of camera phones over the past decade has brought out the amateur photographer in all of us, turning every possible event – from school concerts to sports days – into a paparazzi-like feeding frenzy.

There is nothing more irritating than seeing parents and relatives jostling for position around the altar to get the best vantage point as the priest attempts to carry out the sacrament.

So I was initially delighted to hear that the church has instructed each diocese to draw up guidelines on the use of cameras during religious services. 

However, I was somewhat perplexed to then read reports that part of the reason for the ban relates to the church’s child protection guidelines.

In my view, this is an absolute fallacy and, quite frankly, an insult to parents. A decision to prohibit photography during ceremonies should solely have been made on the basis that it is disrespectful of the occasion and an unwelcome distraction for the children. It should not be rolled out under the guise of a child protection measure.

This is the sort of nonsense that forces right-thinking people to lose all sense of perspective; where every innocent action is viewed with deep suspicion by an increasingly paranoid society.

It is, of course, only right and proper that the church has robust child protection measures in place given the scandalous history of clerical abuse in this country. With good reason, parents today are less trusting of members of the clergy than previous generations were. No longer is a priest considered to be beyond reproach; an untouchable pillar of the community afforded unwavering reverence.

The best protection we can offer our children is our knowledge of what happened in the past. 

It’s a sad reality that many decent, law-abiding priests who abhor the sexual abuse of children have been tarnished by association, through no fault of their own. Moreover, they have been further let down by the often inadequate response of church leaders, both at home and in Rome. But the fact remains that those found to be responsible for abusing children within the Catholic Church were the ones wearing white collars and administering the holy sacraments – not the parents and relatives taking photographs during ceremonies